chore: initial commit — portable agent memory & skill scaffold

Extracted and cleaned up from a prior WSL/Windows agent-memory setup.
Contains only project-agnostic content:

- Claude_Memory/: feedback rules, user profile, reusable reference docs,
  session scratch space (claude_info/, claude_log/), mirrored skill defs
- caveman/: ultra-compressed communication mode skill + subcommands
- html-slide-deck/: self-contained HTML slide deck builder skill

Project-specific knowledge (previously mixed in) was moved out to each
project's own repository as part of this cleanup.

caveman/cavecrew/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+# cavecrew
+
+Decision guide. When to delegate to caveman subagents instead of doing the work inline.
+
+## What it does
+
+Tells the main thread when to spawn a caveman-style subagent versus the vanilla equivalent. The win: subagent tool-results inject back into main context verbatim, and caveman output is roughly 1/3 the size of vanilla prose. Across 20 delegations in one session, that is the difference between context exhaustion and finishing the task.
+
+Three subagents:
+
+| Subagent | Job | Use when |
+|----------|-----|----------|
+| `cavecrew-investigator` | Locate code (read-only) | "Where is X defined / what calls Y / list uses of Z" |
+| `cavecrew-builder` | Surgical edit, 1-2 files | Scope is obvious, ≤2 files. Refuses 3+ file scope. |
+| `cavecrew-reviewer` | Diff/file review | One-line findings with severity emoji |
+
+Use vanilla `Explore` or `Code Reviewer` when you want prose, architecture commentary, or rationale. Use main thread directly for one-line answers and 3+ file refactors.
+
+This skill is a decision guide, not a slash command. It activates when the conversation mentions delegation.
+
+## How to invoke
+
+Triggers on phrases like "delegate to subagent", "use cavecrew", "spawn investigator", "save context", "compressed agent output".
+
+## Example chaining
+
+Locate → fix → verify (most common):
+
+1. `cavecrew-investigator` returns site list (`path:line — symbol — note`)
+2. Main thread picks 1-2 sites, hands paths to `cavecrew-builder`
+3. `cavecrew-reviewer` audits the resulting diff
+
+Parallel scout: spawn 2-3 `cavecrew-investigator` calls in one message with different angles (defs, callers, tests). Aggregate in main.
+
+## See also
+
+- [`SKILL.md`](./SKILL.md) — full decision matrix and output contracts
+- [`agents/cavecrew-investigator.md`](../../agents/cavecrew-investigator.md)
+- [`agents/cavecrew-builder.md`](../../agents/cavecrew-builder.md)
+- [`agents/cavecrew-reviewer.md`](../../agents/cavecrew-reviewer.md)
+- [Caveman README](../../README.md) — repo overview

caveman/cavecrew/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+---
+name: cavecrew
+description: >
+  Decision guide for delegating to caveman-style subagents. Tells the main
+  thread WHEN to spawn `cavecrew-investigator` (locate code), `cavecrew-builder`
+  (1-2 file edit), or `cavecrew-reviewer` (diff review) instead of doing the
+  work inline or using vanilla `Explore`. Subagent output is caveman-compressed
+  so the tool-result injected back into main context is ~60% smaller — main
+  context lasts longer across long sessions.
+  Trigger: "delegate to subagent", "use cavecrew", "spawn investigator/builder/reviewer",
+  "save context", "compressed agent output".
+---
+
+Cavecrew = three subagent presets that emit caveman output. Same job as Anthropic defaults (`Explore`, edit-style agents, reviewer); difference is the tool-result they return is compressed, so main context shrinks per delegation.
+
+## When to use cavecrew vs alternatives
+
+| Task | Use |
+|---|---|
+| "Where is X defined / what calls Y / list uses of Z" | `cavecrew-investigator` |
+| Same but you also want suggestions/architecture commentary | `Explore` (vanilla) |
+| Surgical edit, ≤2 files, scope obvious | `cavecrew-builder` |
+| New feature / 3+ files / cross-cutting refactor | Main thread or `feature-dev:code-architect` |
+| Review diff, branch, or file for bugs | `cavecrew-reviewer` |
+| Deep code review with rationale + alternatives | `Code Reviewer` (vanilla) |
+| One-line answer you already know | Main thread, no subagent |
+
+Rule of thumb: **if you'd want the subagent's output in 1/3 the tokens, pick cavecrew. If you'd want prose, pick vanilla.**
+
+## Why this exists (the real win)
+
+Subagent tool results get injected into main context verbatim. A vanilla `Explore` that returns 2k tokens of prose costs 2k tokens of main-context budget every time. The same finding from `cavecrew-investigator` returns ~700 tokens. Across 20 delegations in one session that's the difference between context exhaustion and finishing the task.
+
+## Output contracts
+
+What main thread can rely on per agent:
+
+**`cavecrew-investigator`**
+```
+<Header>:
+- path:line — `symbol` — short note
+totals: <counts>.
+```
+Or `No match.` Always file-path-first, line-number-attached, backticked symbols. Safe to grep with `path:\d+`.
+
+**`cavecrew-builder`**
+```
+<path:line-range> — <change ≤10 words>.
+verified: <re-read OK | mismatch @ path:line>.
+```
+Or one of: `too-big.` / `needs-confirm.` / `ambiguous.` / `regressed.` (terminal first token).
+
+**`cavecrew-reviewer`**
+```
+path:line: <emoji> <severity>: <problem>. <fix>.
+totals: N🔴 N🟡 N🔵 N❓
+```
+Or `No issues.` Findings sorted file → line ascending.
+
+## Chaining patterns
+
+**Locate → fix → verify** (most common):
+1. `cavecrew-investigator` returns site list.
+2. Main thread picks 1-2 sites, hands paths to `cavecrew-builder`.
+3. `cavecrew-reviewer` audits the diff.
+
+**Parallel scout** (when investigation is broad):
+Spawn 2-3 `cavecrew-investigator` calls in one message (different angles: defs vs callers vs tests). Aggregate in main thread.
+
+**Single-shot edit** (when site is already known):
+Skip investigator. Hand exact path:line to `cavecrew-builder` directly.
+
+## What NOT to do
+
+- Don't use `cavecrew-builder` when you don't already know the file. Spawn investigator first or main thread will eat tokens passing context.
+- Don't chain `cavecrew-investigator → cavecrew-builder` for a 5-file refactor. Builder will return `too-big.` and you'll have wasted a turn.
+- Don't ask `cavecrew-reviewer` for "general feedback" — it returns findings only, no architecture opinions. Use `Code Reviewer` for that.
+- Don't expect prose. Cavecrew output is structured, sometimes terse to the point of cryptic. If a human will read it directly, paraphrase.
+
+## Auto-clarity (inherited)
+
+Subagents drop caveman → normal English for security warnings, irreversible-action confirmations, and any output where fragment ambiguity could be misread. Resume caveman after.